|
Patient Consultation
Medical History, Photographic
Documentation, Patient Goals
The patient is greeted and, if he or she has not done so
already, is asked to fill out a detailed history form. He or
she is then taken to the photography room by a nurse
assistant, who takes digital photographs and escorts the
patient to the examination room. The nurse then downloads
the photographs into the network computer.
I then meet the patient. I ask what he or she does not
like about his or her nose and what the patient would like
me to fix. After the patient explains the goals, I review any
prior medical records. After a review of the patient's medical
history, I then perform an examination.
Aesthetic Nasal Examination
Detailed anatomic analysis of the nose is an essential first
step in achieving a successful surgical outcome. My
approach to rhinoplasty analysis in a primary rhinoplasty is
well described.10 I use this organized approach to aesthetic
analysis for revision rhinoplasty as well (Table 18-1). The
nasal analysis in revision rhinoplasty is made more
complex by the fact of prior surgical intervention, with
subsequent distortion of the pre-existing anatomy.
The first, critical factor is the skin-soft tissue envelope -
its thickness, its quality, its integrity, and its mobility
in relation to the underlying nasal structures. As
analysis proceeds, a critical question that guides examination
of each area is, "was it underresected, overresected,
asymmetrically resected, or appropriately treated?" Any
unoperated areas of the nose are identified. In addition,
the presence of possible grafts or implants is considered
throughout the examination. A partial list of specific considerations
is discussed here.
For the bony dorsum, I examine the osteotomies and
assess their position. Are they too high, normal, or too
low? Is the bony dorsum straight or twisted, wide or narrow?
Will revision osteotomies be required? I look for the
presence of open roof deformity or rocker deformity. In
addition, I judge whether the bony hump was underresected
or overresected. In addition, I palpate the bony
hump for irregularities.
For the middle vault, I assess the middle vault width,
with special attention directed to the presence of an
inverted-V deformity. A narrow middle vault with an
inverted-V deformity suggests a need to restore middle
vault structural support (i.e., spreader grafts). I make a
judgment as to whether the cartilaginous profile was
underresected, overresected, or irregularly resected and
whether the middle vault is straight or deviated. In addition,
I palpate carefully to ascertain whether the dorsal
septum at the anterior septal angle was underresected,
contributing to a pollybeak deformity.
For the tip, I carefully examine and assess tip symmetry,
projection, rotation, alar-columellar relationship, and
lower lateral crural characteristics such as overresection
and bossae formation. I palpate to assess tip support. I
examine the caudal septum to see if it is straight or
twisted. I examine all incisions, both endonasal and external.
I examine carefully for the presence of possible grafts.
Functional Nasal Examination
Static and dynamic nasal valve collapse are commonly
encountered in revision rhinoplasty patients.11-16 In Becker
et al.'s report, 19 of 21 patients with nasal valve collapse
reported a history of rhinoplasty.16
Pinching of the nasal sidewall and alar retraction are
hallmarks of nasal valve collapse (Fig. 18-2). Observing
the patient performing normal and deep nasal inspiration
may lead directly to the diagnosis of nasal valve collapse.
A "modified" Cottle maneuver, in which the lateral nasal
sidewall is supported and elevated slightly with a cerumen
curette of similar device, is strongly supportive of the
diagnosis when the maneuver results in the patient's
report of significant subjective improvement in nasal
breathing.
Anterior rhinoscopy is undertaken and may help identify
abnormalities such as deviated septum, inferior
turbinate hypertrophy, synechiae or scar bands, septal
perforation, and other abnormalities. Examination also
includes nasal endoscopy when there is a complaint of
nasal obstruction.17,18 If indicated, a sinus computed
tomography scan may also be obtained.
Pownell et al. described diagnostic nasal endoscopy in
the plastic surgical literature.17 They traced the historical
development of nasal endoscopy, explained its rationale,
reviewed anatomic and diagnostic issues including the
differential diagnosis of nasal obstruction, and described
the selection of equipment and correct application of
technique, emphasizing the potential for advanced diagnostic
potential.
Levine18 reported that 39% of patients with a complaint
of nasal obstruction had findings on endoscopic
examination that were not identified with traditional
rhinoscopy. Many of Levine's patients had seen other
physicians for this problem and had not received appropriate
treatment.
Becker et al. described that, in patients seeking cosmetic
nasal surgery who also had nasal obstruction, nasal
endoscopy (Fig. 18-3) allowed the diagnosis of additional
pathology not seen on anterior rhinoscopy, including
obstructing adenoids, enlarged middle turbinates with
concha bullosa, choanal stenosis, nasal polyps, and chronic
sinusitis.19,20 In their series, additional surgical therapy was
undertaken in 28 of 96 rhinoplasty patients because of findings on endoscopic exam. Thirteen patients had endoscopic
sinus surgery. Nine patients had a concha bullosa
requiring partial middle turbinectomy. Three patients - all
revision surgeries - had persisting posterior septal deviation
requiring endoscopic septoplasty. Two patients
underwent adenoidectomy. One patient required repair of
choanal stenosis.
Table 18-1 Simplified Algorithm for Visual and Manual Nasal Examination in Revision Rhinoplasty*
General
| Primary concerns |
Identify primary concerns leading patient to seek revision rhinoplasty. |
| Skin quality |
Integrity, vascularity, mobility, skin thickness (thin, medium, or thick). |
| Problems |
For each issue and anatomic area, is problem because of underresection, overresection, asymmetric resection? |
| Frontal |
|
| Width |
Narrow, wide, normal, "wide-narrow-wide"? |
| Dorsum |
Twisted or straight (follow brow-tip aesthetic lines)?
Open roof?
Rocker deformity?
Visible or palpable deformities?
Prior osteotomies? If so, normal or abnormal? |
| Middle Vault |
Assess width. Inverted V? Underresected? Overresected?
Asymmetric? |
| Tip |
Deviated, bulbous, asymmetric, amorphous?
Symmetry, bossae?
Tip support (palpate)?
Status of all prior incisions.
Assess for presence of grafts.
Alar sidewall pinching or retraction? |
| Base |
|
| Tip |
Deviated, wide, bulbous, bifid, asymmetric?
Symmetry, bossae?
Status of caudal septum, projection, tip support (palpate).
Status of all prior incisions.
Assess for presence of grafts.
Triangularity: good versus trapezoidal? |
| Base |
Wide, narrow, or normal?
Inspect for caudal septal deflection.
Assess status of all external incisions. |
| Columella |
Columellar-lobule ratio (normal is 2:1 ratio).
Status of medial crural footplates. |
| Lateral |
|
| Nasofrontal angle |
Shallow or deep? |
| Nasal starting point |
High or low? |
| Dorsum |
Straight, concave, or convex: bony, bony-cartilaginous, or cartilaginous (i.e., is convexity primarily bony,
cartilaginous, or both)?
Visible or palpable irregularities?
Overresected, underresected, or both?
Pollybeak?
Saddle nose? |
| Nasal length |
Normal, short, long? |
| Tip |
Projection (normal, increased, decreased)?
Rotation (nasolabial angle), double break, alar-columellar relationship, Bossae?
Status of caudal septum and tip support. Status of all prior incisions.
Assess for presence of grafts. |
| Oblique |
|
| Does it add anything, or does it confirm the other views? |
*There are many other points of analysis that can be made on each view, but these are some of the vital points of commentary.
Back | Next
Ask Dr. Becker a question about revision rhinoplasty or make an appointment for a consultation, by calling 856-589-NOSE (6673) or emailing us at info@revisionrhinoplasty.com. |